Tanks will probably reduce in focus given their massive expense vs. > a guy basically explaining that tanks may be becoming less of a focus in modern armies, as new weapons and tactics easily counter them. Wouldn't that be the exact kind of technical information an opponent would want to design armor or develop the right tactics for it? For instance, if you increase your side's armor to neutralize it, then your tanks can fight more aggressively. The one about the Chinese projectile seems like it could be pretty bad. > Most of the above seem more in the realm of commercial in confidence leaks, and or embarrassing information for a military than anything that's significant. My understanding is that it's been essential for a long time that tanks travel with significant infantry support. We're seeing "a lot of real truth's play out in Ukraine," but a lot of that seems to be about Russian organization and tactics, not necessarily "how great armored vehicles and tanks are."įor instance: early in the war I read some (US Marine Corps?) study that was online about the Russian "Battalion Tactical Group" that noted some deficiencies that may have made them far more vulnerable in Ukraine (IIRC too many tanks, too little infantry and support troops, too centralized command and control). > Right now we're seeing a lot of real truth's play out in Ukraine about just how great armored vehicles and tanks are. Whilst these are 'classified leaks' they are not exactly strategic leaks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |